Editorial responsibilities

The Editors decide on the publication of articles ensuring a transparent editorial process while evaluating submissions for scholarly merit, originality, clarity of presentation, and alignment with the journal’s scope.

The editorial process and peer review are strictly confidential; reviewers do not have access to authors’ names, affiliations, or ORCID identifiers. Unpublished materials are not used for personal or professional purposes.

Use of AI and ethical considerations:

· tools are employed solely for checking the originality of texts

· authors may consult the results

· AI is not used for editorial decisions or for the preparation of reviews

· data are protected in accordance with security regulations

In cases of suspected ethical violations, including undisclosed use of AI, the Editors act in accordance with COPE guidelines.

All articles undergo evaluation by two external reviewers (double-blind peer review).