Abstract
Online discussions about science topics and the spread of misinformation have revealed the need for better digital, media, and science literacies, especially where these forms of literacy overlap. In the following case study, students in a first- year university writing course at St. Petersburg College in Florida read and viewed popular sources about a scientific subject and expressed their evaluations in a media critique. The purpose of this four- week unit was to improve their capabilities at the intersection of digital, media, and science literacies. Students were exposed to the concept and framework of media literacy and relevant analytical questions. The instructor in this case study led and observed student discussions during class meetings and gave iterative feedback on a four- phase essay drafting process. A total of 86 students over 3 semesters learned about the topic and produced critical essays comparing digital sources from popular media about the subject of microplastics in the environment. As a result, they had time to study one issue in depth and understand a scientific process. They also became more adept critical thinkers as they questioned a source’s audience, purpose, information density, and production, and reflected on creative decisions made by authors. Finally, they became more familiar with lateral reading processes purported to improve digital and media literacy skills.
References
Hobbs Renée. 1998. „The Simpsons meet Mark Twain: Analyzing popular media texts in the classroom.” English Journal no. 87(1). 49–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/822021 (access: 12.05.2026).
View in Google Scholar
Howell Emily L., Brossard Dominique. 2021. „(Mis)informed about what? What it means to be a science- literate citizen in a digital world.” Proceedings of the Digital Literacy, Media Literacy, National Academy of Sciences no. 118(15). Article e1912436117. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912436117 (access: 12.05.2026).
View in Google Scholar
Jambeck Jenna R., Geyer Roland, Wilcox Chris, Siegler Theodore R., Perryman Miriam, Andrady Anthony, Narayan Ramani, Law Kara Lavender. 2015. „Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean.” Science no. 347(6223). 768–771. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260352 (access: 12.05.2026).
View in Google Scholar
Koltay Tibor. 2011. „The media and the literacies: media literacy, information literacy, digital literacy.” Media, Culture & Society no. 33(2). 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443710393382 (access: 12.05.2026).
View in Google Scholar
Martens Hans, Hobbs Renée. 2015. „How media literacy supports civic engagement in a digital age.” Atlantic Journal of Communication no. 23(2). 120–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2014.961636 (access: 12.05.2026).
View in Google Scholar
National Association for Media Literacy Education. 2025. Key questions to ask when analyzing media experiences. https://namle.org/resources/key-questions-for-analyzing-media/ (access: 12.05.2026).
View in Google Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2025. News platform fact sheet. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/fact-sheet/news-platform-fact-sheet/ (access: 12.05.2026).
View in Google Scholar
Wineburg Sam, McGrew Sarah. (2019). „Lateral reading and the nature of expertise: Reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information.” Teachers College Record no. 121(11). 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811912101102 (access: 12.05.2026).
View in Google Scholar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia de Cultura
