Foto-teksty? W poszukiwaniu narzędzia analizy współczesnej artystycznej fotografi i dokumentalnej
PDF (Język Polski)

How to Cite

Michałowska, M. (2014). Foto-teksty? W poszukiwaniu narzędzia analizy współczesnej artystycznej fotografi i dokumentalnej. Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia De Cultura, 2, 15–26. Retrieved from https://studiadecultura.uken.krakow.pl/article/view/1569

Abstract

Photo-texts? Searching for a tool of analysis of contemporary documentary photography

A term "photo-text" emphasizes a contemporary change in visual culture researches, where photography is a link between a photographed object and its cultural meaning. In a book titled “Phototextuality” Andrea Noble and Alex Hughes stated that phototextuality plays “between the culturally fabricated nature of photographic artifact and its fundamental indexality, that is, its status as a trace of the real; and evidential manifestation of what has been”. Photo-texts characterised by critical, self-reflective and intertextual attitude towards culture go together with contemporary interests with narration, memory and history. The text is divided into few parts. I consider a status of phototextuality in the first one and present basic researches on textuality of photography in the second. I compare Roland Barthes’s analysis to a John Berger’s and Jean Mohr’s project there. Part three is dedicated to visual studies, where phototextuality is a field of discussion with models of art and popular culture (on an example of Gregor Brandler work). Finally, in the fourth part a critical attitude of photo-texts towards history is presented. In conclusion, photo-texts are regarded as an effective tool of contemporary culture analysis, both on the level of its production and on “reading” level. This reading is not a “free” or “mis” -reading, that tears the meanings off the objects of reference, but rather which “anchorages” those meanings in represented object.

PDF (Język Polski)

References

Bal M. (1999), Introduction, w: The Practice of Cultural Analysis. Exposing Interdisciplinary Interpretation, ed. M. Bal, Stanford, California.
View in Google Scholar

Bal M. (2001), Louise Bourgeois’ Spider. The Architecture of Art-writing, Chicago and London.
View in Google Scholar

Bal M. (2003), Visual essentialism and the object of visual culture, “Journal of Visual Culture”, Vol. 2(1).
View in Google Scholar

Barthes R. (1971), Trzeci sens. Poszukiwania na podstawie kilku fotogramów z filmów S.N. Eisensteina, przeł. R. Wyborski, „Kino” nr 1, s. 37–41.
View in Google Scholar

Berger J., Mohr J. (1995), Another Way of Telling, New York.
View in Google Scholar

Domańska E. (2006), Historie niekonwencjonalne, Poznań.
View in Google Scholar

Fried M. (2008), Why photography matters as art as never before?, New Haven and London.
View in Google Scholar

Fryer Davidov J. (2003), Narratives of Place: History and Memory and the Evidential Force of Photography in Work by Meridel Rubinstein and Joan Myers, w: Phototextualities: intersection of photography and narrative, ed. A. Hughes, A. Noble. Albuquerque.
View in Google Scholar

Hughes A., Noble A. (2003), Introduction, w: Phototextualities: intersection of photography and narrative, ed. A. Hughes, A. Noble. Albuquerque.
View in Google Scholar

Kuhn A. (2002), Family secrets. Acts of Memory and Imagination, London, New York.
View in Google Scholar

Owens C. (1994), Beyond recognition: representation, power and culture. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London.
View in Google Scholar

Rosner K. (2003), Narracja, tożsamość, czas, Kraków.
View in Google Scholar

Scott C. (1999), The spoken image: photography and language, London.
View in Google Scholar

Sikora S. (2004), Fotografia. Między dokumentem a symbolem. Izabelin.
View in Google Scholar

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.