Abstract
Abstract: This study explores the media strategies of Czech and Slovak YouTube influencers specializing in artificial intelligence (AI) reporting and analysis. Focusing on content creators who primarily produce tech-oriented content about AI technologies, tools, and industry developments, the research examines their communication approaches, audience engagement techniques, and the role of these influencers in shaping public understanding of AI. Through a comprehensive content analysis and qualitative research methodology, the study investigates how these tech-focused YouTubers construct narratives around AI, select topics, and mediate complex technological information for their audience. The research provides insights into the emerging landscape of tech commentary in Slovak digital media, highlighting the unique communication strategies employed by AI-focused content creators in translating complex technological discourse for a broader audience.
References
Albadri Hani. 2023. “The role and impact of social media influencers”. Information Sciences Letters nr 12(8). 2685–2696. https://doi.org/10.18576/isl/120821.
View in Google Scholar
Baker Sarah. 2022. “Uncertainties and ambivalence surrounding AI: Popular filmic representations as real-world threat or saviour”. Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture nr 13(3). 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1386/iscc_00067_1.
View in Google Scholar
Bal Mieke. 2017. Narratology: Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Toronto.
View in Google Scholar
Burgess Jean, Green Joshua. 2018. YouTube: Online video and participatory culture. Cambridge.
View in Google Scholar
Cave Stephen, Coughlan Kate, Dihal Kanta. 2019. “Scary Robots: Examining Public Responses to AI”. W: Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES ’19). 331–337. https://doi.org/10.1145/3306618.3314232.
View in Google Scholar
Deona Salsabila, Trigunawan Ivan, Mukhti Berlina. 2024. “Prospective public education in the era of digitalization through content creators”. SPEKTRUM: Jurnal Pendidikan Luar Sekolah (PLS) nr 12(3). 344. https://doi.org/10.24036/spektrumpls.v12i3.129553.
View in Google Scholar
Entman Robert M. 1993. “Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm”. Journal of Communication nr 43(4). 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
View in Google Scholar
Han Celik Beril. 2024. “Media’s Approach to Artificial Intelligence: Content Analysis of US Newspapers”. Yeni Medya Dergisi nr 17. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.55609/yenimedya.1532473.
View in Google Scholar
Joemono Isabelle Christine, Oktavianti Roswita. 2022. “Popular culture in video content on YouTube”. W: 3rd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2021). Jakarta. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220404.204.
View in Google Scholar
Kochetova Larisa Anatolyevna. 2023. “Linguocultural specifics of artificial intelligence representation in the English language media discourse: Corpus-based approach”. Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Serija 2. Jazykoznanije nr 22(5). 6–18. https://doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu2.2023.5.1.
View in Google Scholar
Kress Gunther, van Leeuwen Theo. 2006. Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London.
View in Google Scholar
Ledbetter Andrew Michael. 2022. “The paradox of parasocial relationships: A review of the decades of research”. W: The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects. Rössler Patrick Rössler, Hoffner Cynthia A. Hoffner, van Zoonen Liesbet van Zoonen (red.). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.
View in Google Scholar
Lewis Rebecca. 2019. “‘This Is What the News Won’t Show You’: YouTube Creators and the Reactionary Politics of Micro-celebrity”. Television & New Media nr 21(2). 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419879919.
View in Google Scholar
Nolen Beth Lynn. 2019. “Developing technology training videos”. W: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM SIGUCCS Annual Conference. 112–116. https://doi.org/10.1145/3347709.3347787.
View in Google Scholar
Marr Bernard. 2023. “A short history of ChatGPT: How we got to where we are today”. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2023/05/19/a-short-history-of-chatgpt-how-we-got-to-where-we-are-today/.
View in Google Scholar
Ouchchy Leila, Coin Allen, Dubljević Veljko. 2020. “AI in the headlines: The portrayal of the ethical issues of artificial intelligence in the media”. AI & SOCIETY nr 35(4). 927–936. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-020-00965-5.
View in Google Scholar
Patalauskaitė Emilija. 2024. “Ethical aspects of content creation”. Filosofija. Sociologija nr 35(3). 369–377. https://doi.org/10.6001/fil-soc.2024.35.3.14.
View in Google Scholar
Porto Renó Denis. 2007. “YouTube, el mediador de la cultura popular en el ciberespacio”. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social nr 62. 190–196. https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-62-2007-742-190-196.
View in Google Scholar
Richter Vanessa. 2022. “Social Media Platforms as Multi-Sided Stakeholders: YouTube’s Role in Shaping Imaginaries of AI”. AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research. https://doi.org/10.5210/spir.v2022i0.13077.
View in Google Scholar
Riek Laurel D., Adams Andra, Robinson Peter. 2011. “Exposure to cinematic depictions of robots and attitudes towards them”. W: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE
View in Google Scholar
International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. Workshop on Expectations and Intuitive Human-Robot Interaction. https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~pr10/publications/hri11.pdf.
View in Google Scholar
Roe Jasper, Perkins Mike. 2023. “‘What they’re not telling you about ChatGPT’: exploring the discourse of AI in UK news media headlines”. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications nr 10. 753. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02282-w.
View in Google Scholar
Schwarz Andreas, Unselt Janina Jacqueline. 2024. “Rage against the machine? Framing societal threat and efficacy in YouTube videos about artificial intelligence”. Risk Analysis nr 44(10). 2377–2395. https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.14299.
View in Google Scholar
Vrabec Norbert, Zubková Klára. 2024. “The profile of AI in cinematic narratives”. W: Marketing Identity: Human vs. Artificial. 726–738. https://doi.org/10.34135/mmidentity-2024-72.
View in Google Scholar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia de Cultura
