Media Education 4.0 in Practice: The SRF Model. Towards Applied Media Studies and Post‑Digital Education

Supplementary Files

PDF (Język Polski)

Keywords

media education 4.0
systemic‑relational‑functional model
applied media studies
post‑digital education edukacja medialna 4.0
model systemowo‑relacyjno‑funkcjonalny
medioznawstwo stosowane
edukacja postcyfrowa

How to Cite

Ogonowska, A. (2026). Media Education 4.0 in Practice: The SRF Model. Towards Applied Media Studies and Post‑Digital Education. Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia De Cultura, 18(1), 7–41. https://doi.org/10.24917/20837275.18.1.1

Abstract

The article addresses the development of media and digital competencies among children and adolescents as a key challenge for twenty‑first‑century education. In response to the growing importance of media and technology in the lives of the younger generation, it presents an original systemic‑relational‑functional (SRF) model designed to diagnose patterns of media use from the perspectives of students, peers, and adults. The model is based on a review of the literature, findings from qualitative research, and training experience. The article also discusses the concept of post‑digital education and its practical implementation within Media Education 4.0, which involves a shift from learning about technology to learning through technology and redefines the agency of students and teachers as co‑actors within a cognitive‑technological network. The proposed perspective promotes a critical, relational, and hybrid approach to learning in a digital environment, emphasizing the co‑agency of humans and technology. The aim of the article is to present the author’s theoretical model and the related diagnostic and educational tool. The article is therefore both research‑oriented and implementation‑oriented, as the questionnaires included with it illustrate the main assumptions of the SRF model.

https://doi.org/10.24917/20837275.18.1.1

References

Anderson Emma Louise, Steen Eloisa, Stavropoulos Vasileios. 2017. „Internet use and problematic internet use: Systematic review of longitudinal research trends”. Journal of Behavioral Addictions nr 6(4). 539–556. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.6.2017.060.
View in Google Scholar

Berry David Michael. 2011. The Philosophy of Software: Code and Mediation in the Digital Age. Basingstoke, Hampshire–New York.
View in Google Scholar

Berry David Michael. 2014. Critical Theory and the Digital. New York–London–New Delhi–Sydney.
View in Google Scholar

Berry David Michael, Dieter Michael (red.). 2015. Postdigital Aesthetics: Art, Computation and Design. Basingstoke.
View in Google Scholar

Bertalanffy Ludwig von. 1968. General System Theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. New York, NY.
View in Google Scholar

Bowen Murray. 1978. Family Therapy in Clinical Practice. New York, NY.
View in Google Scholar

Bronfenbrenner Urie. 1979. The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA.
View in Google Scholar

de Barbaro Bogdan. 1999. Wprowadzenie do systemowego rozumienia rodziny. Kraków.
View in Google Scholar

de Barbaro Bogdan. 2011. Postmodernistyczne propozycje w psychoterapii rodzin. Kraków.
View in Google Scholar

Granic Isabela, Lobel Adam, Engels Rutger C.M.E. 2014. „The benefits of playing video games”. American Psychologist nr 69(1). 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034857.
View in Google Scholar

Jandrić Petar. 2017. Learning in the Age of Digital Reason. Rotterdam.
View in Google Scholar

Jandrić Petar, Knox Jeremy, Besley Tina, Ryberg Thomas, Suoranta Juha, Hayes Sarah. 2018. „Postdigital science and education”. Educational Philosophy and Theory nr 50(10). 893–899. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1454000.
View in Google Scholar

Kardefelt‑Winther Daniel. 2014. „A conceptual and methodological critique of internet addiction research: Towards a model of compensatory internet use”. Computers in Human Behavior nr 31. 351–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.059.
View in Google Scholar

Livingstone Sonia, Helsper Ellen. 2010. „Balancing opportunities and risks in teenagers’ use of the internet: The role of online skills and internet self‑efficacy”. New Media & Society nr 12(2). 309–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342697.
View in Google Scholar

Manovich Lev. 2001. The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA.–London.
View in Google Scholar

Manovich Lev. 2013. Software Takes Command. New York.
View in Google Scholar

Ogonowska Agnieszka. 2024a. „Kompetencje audialne w kulturze cyfrowej 3.0. Wybrane ujęcia, konteksty i metody badawcze”. Studia de Cultura nr 16(2). 19–32. https://doi.org/10.24917/20837275.16.2.2
View in Google Scholar

Ogonowska Agnieszka. 2024b. „Kultury i narracje w ujęciu neurokognitywno‑rozwojowym i relacyjno‑funkcjonalny. W stronę użytkownika”. Studia de Cultura nr 16(3). 5–15.
View in Google Scholar

Ogonowska Agnieszka. 2018. Uzależnienia medialne. Uwarunkowania, leczenie, profilaktyka. Kraków.
View in Google Scholar

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Annales Universitatis Paedagogicae Cracoviensis. Studia de Cultura

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.